The Relationship Between Empathy and Stringency of Punishment in Mock Jurors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.5334/jeps.crKeywords:
jury decision making, mock jurors, empathy, Interpersonal Reactivity Index, sentence lengthAbstract
The aim of the present study is to investigate the relationship between empathy and stringency of punishment in mock jurors. 291 law and non-law students (123 male, 166 female) participated in the study. Participants first read a court case explaining that the defendant was found guilty of aggravated assault. Participants then made a sentencing decision for the defendant and later answered the Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI). The results revealed a significant negative correlation between overall empathy and stringency of punishment. Two of the four sub-scales of the IRI (perspective taking and empathic concern) were of interest in the current study, and as hypothesized each showed a significant negative correlation with stringency of punishment.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2015 The Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
JEPS is an open access journal. Authors who publish in the Journal of European Psychology Students agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access). Authors should, however, take into account APA's guidelines on posting work that is still in review (APA Publication Manual 6th Edition, p. 211) which state that the name of the publisher or the journal should not be mentioned during the submission process.